Question: Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Other, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Nowadays most of the researchers believe that people’s health is a critical factor in developing and improvements of a society. There are a lot of activities which can help this increment in public. Both advantageous and disadvantageous are outlined below.
Firstly, scientists believe that people can prevent aging disorders by using sports facilities and doing sports like table tennis and jugging. Due to research by Sharif University of Technology, these types of training can affect mental issues up to twenty percents and people who live in Tokyo, Japan as a sample, were one of the best examples of this fact which their government started to paying attention to public health since in excess of fifty years ago and, they can observe the reflections of these activities in their total age now.
On the other hand, some people would argue that not only sports are pressingly necessary for public health, but also leisure equipment and services play a more active role in this dilemma. For instance, public concerts and entertainment centers can increase the desire to live, and followed by, it can decrease depression and anti-sociality.
Moreover, some statistics reveal that health is completely connected to genetics and DNA. Consequently, social safeguards cannot have a profound effect on this topic and we need more psychological investigations if we want to remedy this problem.
In conclusion, from my point of view, governments should provide an atmosphere to change humans’ mood and sports facilities, well-fare and hobbies are significantly needed together. In addition, society can benefit from fames and celebrities too.